Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Aug 2000 09:58:36 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, David May <David_May@allsolutions.com.au>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [Q] why does my firewall degrade Web performance? 
Message-ID:  <200008171558.JAA23163@nomad.yogotech.com>
In-Reply-To: <200008170516.XAA09705@harmony.village.org>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008161825580.14500-100000@achilles.silby.com> <200008170516.XAA09705@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : > The firewall machine CPU load is always light. It is a Pentium II Celeron
> : > 300MHz, 64Mb RAM, four Ethernet cards (3 D-Link 10/100, 1 NE2000),
> : > and around 180 ipfw rules.
> : 
> : I'm not sure how fast/slow ipfw is, but 180 rules sounds like a
> : LOT.  Could you get by with a few less?  (Or at least try the setup with
> : no rules and the firewall box just runningas a pure router.)
> 
> 180 is about normal for having multiple cards.  300MHz should be
> plenty fast enough.

No kidding.  I have 133 on my firewall, and it's a 486/66, and it keeps
up *just fine* running with a 100MB ethernet connected to a T1.

I've never seen the box under any load average, and it's been on the net
since '93.  We used a 486 for firewall in commercial products (and
would continue to do so except that you can't find them anymore).



Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008171558.JAA23163>