Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 16:39:52 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: Rajesh Vaidheeswarran <rv@freebsd.org> Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/cons-test Makefile ports/devel/cons-test/files md5 ports/devel/cons-test/pkg COMMENT DESCR MESSAGE PLIST Message-ID: <20000915163952.R47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <200009152038.QAA17587@mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com>; from rv@freebsd.org on Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:38:16PM -0400 References: <ade@freebsd.org> <200009152038.QAA17587@mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:38:16PM -0400, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran wrote:
> Actually, I don't mind the suggestion that the port be named cons-testbed.
> But, given the fact that the name of the original package itself is cons-test,
> and that every other OS package (RPM, deb, etc.) we have created for it
> took that name, I feel that it might just help confuse users when going
> across different platforms.
Based on all of the clarifications that this isn't another version of cons, but
an actually program called "cons-test", I feel everything should stay as is, and
we should trust Rajesh's naming conventions in the future. :->
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000915163952.R47559>