Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 10:42:05 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ri=C4=8Dardas_=C4=8Cepas?= <rch@richard.eu.org> To: "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@peorth.iteration.net>, freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal to include iconv library in the base system. Message-ID: <20000916104205.B1223@richard.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20000916010804.A51927@peorth.iteration.net>; from keichii@iteration.net on Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 01:08:04AM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10008241719320.80086-100000@lion.butya.kz> <20000901185945.A29804@nagual.pp.ru> <39AFD666.880FE6C@dante.org.uk> <20000901205825.A30569@nagual.pp.ru> <39AFE5B6.1F418EDD@dante.org.uk> <20000916010804.A51927@peorth.iteration.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat Sep 16 01:08:04 2000 -0500 Michael C . Wu wrote:
> P.S.#2: Does anyone know if Linux has a counterpart of ICONV?
> Perhaps we should propose a standard.
>
It has since glibc2.1 though in glibc2.2 it is better.
And of cource other unices had it for years though quality of implementation often is bad.
As far as I heard iconv is needed for Unix(R) branding.
--
☻ Ričardas Čepas ☺
~~
~
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-i18n" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000916104205.B1223>