Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 22:36:08 -0400 From: "Sean O'Connell" <sean@stat.Duke.EDU> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro <sanpei@sanpei.org>, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [pcic irq] May I change default pcic mode into polling? Message-ID: <20000930223608.A8104@stat.Duke.EDU> In-Reply-To: <200009300312.e8U3CEG24409@billy-club.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:12:14PM -0600 References: <200009300201.e8U218r00518@lavender.sanpei.org> <200009300312.e8U3CEG24409@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh stated: : In message <200009300201.e8U218r00518@lavender.sanpei.org> MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro writes: : : I used polling mode from July, and there is no problem. May I : : commit same changes into 4-stable(RELENG_4) tree? : : : : Any comments? : : This looks ok. I think that the stylistic "no irq" is just to omit it : from the config line. On the other hand, irq 0 does make it clear you : are specifying an IRQ and that IRQ isn't used. So yes, go for it. It : is a good change. Could we get rid of the pcic1 as well? Or maybe move it into LINT as an example? I think it is just confusing otherwise. S -- 1--------01---------01--------01--------01--------01--------01--------0 Sean O'Connell sean@stat.Duke.EDU To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000930223608.A8104>