Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:39:55 -0500
From:      Kevin Way <kway@wgate.com>
To:        David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: GDB 4.18 and shared libraries (Mozilla)
Message-ID:  <20001030113955.A15063@wgate.com>
In-Reply-To: <20001026231524.F9391@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:15:24PM -0700
References:  <ybu1yxgjwqo.fsf@jesup.eng.tvol.net.jesup.eng.tvol.net> <20000919103436.B94601@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009201229450.13341-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> <20000920005447.B97385@dragon.nuxi.com> <ybu1yxgjwqo.fsf@jesup.eng.tvol.net.jesup.eng.tvol.net> <200010180000.SAA13097@harmony.village.org> <20001026231524.F9391@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:15:24PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:00:32PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message <ybu1yxgjwqo.fsf@jesup.eng.tvol.net.jesup.eng.tvol.net> Randell Jesup writes:
> > :         Well, personally, as a _user_ of FreeBSD, I don't care who has the
> > : finger pointed at them, or who claims "it isn't _our_ bug".  I care that no
> > : one can debug a program that uses shared libraries under -STABLE, and I
> > : care when it will be fixed.  I don't consider a system I have to patch the
> > : loader in order to debug my code to be "STABLE".
> > 
> > No one is arguing with you that there is a bug.  It is a matter of
> > finding someone to fix it.
> 
> It isn't a matter of finding _someone_ to fix it, but _where_ to fix it.
> 
> Either in the offical Binutils src tree where I take Binutils from, or in
> the FreeBSD src/binutils, where I really don't like makeing and
> maintaining local mods -- we've screwed the pooch too many times doing
> that.

I'm a little confused here, on the 25th you applied the patch which
Bruce Bauman had stole from the binutils CVS tree, thus fixing the bug.
Now on the 26th you're writing a message that indicates you are
unwilling to have any modification from binutils 2.10, even if it 
fixes a bug.

Can I rely on the previously applied patch to stay in -STABLE, or
alternately for binutils or gdb to be updated appropriately such that
debugging works cleanly, without additional source tree patches?

	--Kevin

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
kevin way                                                  215 354 5287
software engineer                                        kway@wgate.com
worldgate communications


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001030113955.A15063>