Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:22:58 +0600 (NS) From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> Cc: "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com>, "'Doug Barton'" <DougB@FreeBSD.org>, "'FreeBSD Hackers mailing list'" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: daemon() Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011082220350.31723-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <200011081532.HAA14728@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Don Lewis wrote: > } > > No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything > } > > anymore. > } > } > Then why is it there? To help up the port count? If it's not good, it should > } > be nuked, IMHO. > } > } people still use it because it is smaller > } obrien has already tried to remove it once (in Mar 1999) > } > } as for me -- I do not try to hunt bugs in bash1 and do not blame it. > } my question was about unclosed pipe > > It appears to be a descriptor that your shell failed to close before > execing your test program. Unless you do something out of the ordinary > like run > program 27>somefile > the shell should only leave three descriptors (0, 1, and 2 for stdin, stdout, > and stderr) open when it execs another program. yes, I understand that. My point is that bash1 is still used and comments about braindead people who use it should be redirected to /dev/null. I think we should stop this thread. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0011082220350.31723-100000>