Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:02:40 -0800 From: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: FreeBSD SMP list <FreeBSD-smp@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys ipl.h Message-ID: <20001208150240.S2312@canonware.com> In-Reply-To: <20001209091057.H37171@wantadilla.lemis.com>; from grog@lemis.com on Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:10:57AM %2B1030 References: <200012081039.eB8Ad2214309@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001209091057.H37171@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:10:57AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 8 December 2000 at 2:39:02 -0800, Jake Burkholder wrote: > > jake 2000/12/08 02:39:02 PST > > > > Modified files: > > sys/sys ipl.h > > Log: > > Remove unused declarations for spending and sdelayed, and remove unused > > #defines for bits corresponding to pending interrupts. Yay threads! > > I'm a bit concerned about the pace of change in this code. We have > significant problems in the current kernel (for example, I haven't > been able to complete a make world for a week now, because the system > goes catatonic). We should be looking for these problems, difficult > as it may be, not moving on. Greg, "this code" is a bunch of unused cpp macros. How are you concerned that this might further increase instability? Just because there are existing known bugs doesn't mean that commits should unilaterally stop. Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001208150240.S2312>