Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:28:38 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org> Cc: small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sash as a shell replacement ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0101111227010.66249-100000@mx.webgiro.com> In-Reply-To: <200101102352.f0ANqbI56681@iguana.aciri.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > sash has very poor shell functionality. I would suggest using Minix sh > > which is very Bourne-like, and is also very small. > > what kind of licensing does it have ? I was about to go BSD. The whole Minix was recently (October?) put under BSD license. > for a different approach, namely use the standard sh as > a shell, and a slightly modified 'sash' for a bunch of commands > such as more, grep etc. That's basically the same approach, except that Minix sh is already much much smaller. Andrzej Bialecki // <abial@webgiro.com> WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com) // ------------------------------------------------------------------- // ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org -------- // --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.0101111227010.66249-100000>