Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:16:52 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Duncan Barclay <dmlb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ray if_ray_oldcard.h if_ray.c if_rayvar.h Message-ID: <200101180616.f0I6Gqs43312@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:38:59 PST." <200101180438.f0I4cxK08723@mobile.wemm.org> References: <200101180438.f0I4cxK08723@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200101180438.f0I4cxK08723@mobile.wemm.org> Peter Wemm writes: : Warner Losh wrote: : > In message <200101180411.f0I4BdK08452@mobile.wemm.org> Peter Wemm writes: : > : If you use NEWCARD and -current, you can map these really high - beyond the : > : end of memory. : > : > Yes. Except I don't think that ray has been newcarded. : : I looked at it last week sometime and nearly had a heart attack when I : saw how intimate it was with the pccard code.... Yes. But it has to be because it is such a twisted design. At least the API should be the same between oldcard and newcard. That was a design goal anyway. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101180616.f0I6Gqs43312>