Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:08:16 -0500 From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha exception.s genassym.c machdep.c swtch.s Message-ID: <20010201130815.B17742@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <200101311117.f0VBH1j60082@freefall.freebsd.org>; from dfr@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 03:17:01AM -0800 References: <200101311117.f0VBH1j60082@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Rabson [dfr@FreeBSD.org] wrote: <...> > A new flag in the trapframe indicates that the frame only holds partial > state. When it is necessary to perform a full state restore (e.g. after an > execve or signal), the flag is cleared to force a full restore. Perhaps this was only partially committed? I'm now seeing the following when attempting to build a kernel: % make cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../dev -I/usr/include -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf -mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -Wa,-mev56 ../../alpha/alpha/genassym.c ../../alpha/alpha/genassym.c:136: `FRAME_FLAGS' undeclared here (not in a function) ../../alpha/alpha/genassym.c:136: `FRAME_FLAGS' undeclared here (not in a functi <....> Do you have a newer alpha/include/frame.h which was supposed to be committed as well? Drew -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Andrew Gallatin, Sr Systems Programmer http://www.cs.duke.edu/~gallatin Duke University Email: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Department of Computer Science Phone: (919) 660-6590 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010201130815.B17742>