Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:12:02 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: ben@cahostnet.net Cc: Tim McMillen <timcm@umich.edu>, Sean Cull <Sean@blizzard.bc.tac.net>, "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: procfs full?? Message-ID: <200102112312.f1BNC2L04311@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Feb 2001 17:15:04 PST." <20010208011504.50B4236F9@sitemail.everyone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Before folks get too excited, by definition, procfs is ALWAYS 100% used. This is normal and the nature of procfs. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:15:04 -0800 (PST) > From: Benjamin Ossei <ben@cahostnet.net> > Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > It's pretty possible to fill out procfs b/c I noticed that mine was also at 100% filled. I haven't looked into it yet though. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102112312.f1BNC2L04311>