Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:48:16 +0000
From:      Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To:        Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
Cc:        mobile@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Any ideas on keeping the disk spun down on laptop
Message-ID:  <20010212234816.M35416@hand.dotat.at>
In-Reply-To: <20010212211351.F35416@hand.dotat.at>
References:  <200102112211.f1BMBCL23187@ptavv.es.net> <20010212211351.F35416@hand.dotat.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
>Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote:
>>
>>Has anyone looked into making update(4) not do any disk IO when there
>>have been no changes to metadata? And, is there a way to extend the
>>update period? Or am I completely off base in my belief that update(4)
>>is the source of the continuing disk accesses.
>
>There is a simple patch to extend the time between syncer runs: see
>PR#21859. I've been running with this for months now and it works
>nicely.

Regarding the other followups I should probably add that I don't mount
my disks noatime and I leave atrun and cron on.

The caveat of course is that you risk losing more data in the event of
running out of battery power or whatever :-)

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch    fanf@covalent.net    dot@dotat.at
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: NORTHWEST 4 OR 5, BUT SOUTHWEST 5 IN SOUTH AT FIRST. RAIN
AT FIRST. MODERATE BECOMING GOOD.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010212234816.M35416>