Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:18:39 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, Steve Price <steve@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ksh93 Message-ID: <20010228141838.B33017@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <200102281813.f1SIDkR54747@vic.sabbo.net>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:12:33PM %2B0200 References: <20010228112329.A9192@hamlet.nectar.com> <200102281813.f1SIDkR54747@vic.sabbo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:12:33PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Well, ld.so could still break, and anyway you'd lose the ability to > > Probability of ld.so breakage is quite low, much lower than any of the > base libs, I guess I was thinking in terms of inaccessible /usr, which is the most common thing I've run into. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010228141838.B33017>