Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 05:41:47 +0200 From: Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de> To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Translators: Need feedback on FAQ reorganization Message-ID: <20010326054147.D31676@nathan.ruhr.de> In-Reply-To: <20010316190808.A389@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>; from nik@freebsd.org on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 07:08:08PM %2B0000 References: <20010313002953.I77178@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010313124524.B2130@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010313231654.G83336@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010314131233.C6138@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010314210730.J83336@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010315023806.B46684@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010315200337.N83336@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010315210350.A1113@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010316104207.H24155@django.de.uu.net> <20010316190808.A389@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dkEUBIird37B8yKS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 07:08:08PM +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:42:07AM +0000, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 09:03:50PM +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > > > As already noted, you seem to have > > > a good record of getting PRs committed. > > That's no big surprise because I've learned to cheat: Find a committer, > > pester him until he agrees to the proposed change, do the work, submit > > the PR and voila, no more working for the trash can. No, that's not > > the correct way to do things. > That's certainly one way to do things. Until we get more committers I > wouldn't be surprised if it was quite an effective way. It is effective - and it makes your "good record of getting PRs committed" criterium absolutely worthless. =20 > > right now I'm resting my case on the point that existing code is one of > > the better arguments :-> > Attached is a diff to freebsd.dsl which rewrites Norm's > xref-biblioentry function, and a diff to the FAQ to use it. I'll take a close look at it (and the html codes it generates) once I've managed to clean up the collateral damage caused by revision 1.155 of the FAQ. /s/Udo --=20 "They had no guns and no ties. What's your excuse this time?" "I had ammo." http://www.userfriendly.org --dkEUBIird37B8yKS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQCVAwUBOr66e0Poh1XnT6hxAQGedgP/QyUNHy5iBJnS2DJ+DevoT7c7XjxF6SH9 gl2gpsLuk83xWfOmm0JqzVemUnBwjK7ur+z0bncf9D+BfRhdsrRIkpSyXFRAMBBG CcHngVKePwnxGNjbNgzwrq0D7VDtNT4nsi7/TE19upBNSAn4albDo/r+Kfr7gCnO Aqiw5yDIxCQ= =EYej -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dkEUBIird37B8yKS-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010326054147.D31676>