Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:21:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks <jim@siteplus.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No go with glob.3.x.patch Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104192116330.1970-100000@veager.siteplus.net> In-Reply-To: <20010419181109.A57224@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > What version of FreeBSD? FreeBSD 3.5-STABLE Wed Jan 31 > Did you already apply the old patch? If so, you should have backed it > out with patch -R before applying the new one. Started clean. > > However, when comparing libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c with libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c.rej, > > we find that the patch has been applied as is evidenced bellow. > > Only the first hunk, the second hunk failed (as noted above) As I understand it, only the failed chunk would have been sent to libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c.rej? > These are warnings, not errors (well, not sure what the partial > message was on the first line, it might have been an error). If you > built with make -j this can obscure the relation of the compiler > output to what is actually causing the error message. I didn't use -j. I did try make all, and simply make. Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0104192116330.1970-100000>