Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 20:37:16 +0200 From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another problem with the new CAM error handling Message-ID: <20010430203716.F50864@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <20010429172426.B41838@panzer.kdm.org>; from ken@kdm.org on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 05:24:26PM -0600 References: <20010426110542.A50185@uriah.heep.sax.de> <200104261435.f3QEZLs23573@aslan.scsiguy.com> <20010426190714.E50185@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20010428231227.A37369@panzer.kdm.org> <20010429185353.C50185@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20010429172426.B41838@panzer.kdm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > Also, i'd like to prefer that > > over issuing a bus reset in case a temporarily added SCSI device is > > being manually removed. > > Do you mean "bus rescan" instead of "bus reset"? You're right, i was confused. OK, since it's only a rescan, it's not such a tragedy. So a `camcontrol detach' is a nice to have item, but nothing even remotely urgent. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010430203716.F50864>