Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 14:01:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using connect() on UDP RPC client sockets. Message-ID: <200105211801.OAA08653@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200105211856.aa41143@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> References: <20010521172419.A672@crow.dom2ip.de> <200105211856.aa41143@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 21 May 2001 18:56:02 +0100, Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> said: > I think the option should be renamed to something like IP_SENDSRCADDR > just to avoid confusion - does this seem reasonable? I think it's OK to add an additional name for the same control message, but it should be possible (and documented) to use the exact control message as was returned from recvmsg() as argument to sendmsg(). -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105211801.OAA08653>