Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:17 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make release failure Message-ID: <20010528071217.0D1C43E0B@bazooka.unixfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <20010527235220.A75041@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on "Sun, 27 May 2001 23:52:20 -0700"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:32:09PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > +.if !defined(NORELNOTES) > > Do we really need Yet Another Knob? Why isn't NODOC suffient? FWIW, I think we should lose NORELNOTES; as you say, NODOC is sufficient. > I cannot think of any reason that the people who typically use NODOC=yes > would want release notes. Heh, it isn't like they could get them, anyway. RELNOTESng depends on the doc tree. Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org > Or please at least treat NODOCS=yes ==> NORELNOTES=yes. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010528071217.0D1C43E0B>