Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:55:55 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Terminal line discipline is broken [sorta] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106131938390.66726-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20010610145322.A461@iv.nn.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:04:10, bde (Bruce Evans) wrote about "Re: Terminal line discipline is broken [sorta]": > > > This may be a bug in tcsh. > > Do you really think that shell should not modify signal handling policy > which he obtained as legacy from login? And application which resets > them to appropriate position is buggy? Non-interactive shells certainly shouldn't unblock/unignore blocked/ignored signals. I think it doesn't matter much for interactive shells. Login would only change the system defaults if it is broken. > My ktracing of bash (2.04) shows that it isn't really set procmask > to own values, but uses legacy value. Maybe I'm wrong, but this seems > that sh & bash are buggy, not tcsh. Bash does much more initialization for signals than sh. Maybe it knows what it is doing :-). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0106131938390.66726-100000>