Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 02:11:04 -0500 From: Steve Price <steve@freebsd.org> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases Makefile ports/databases/pgaccess Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/databases/pgaccess/files patch-aa Message-ID: <20010618021104.P94855@bsd.havk.org> In-Reply-To: <20010618020302.F49931@bohr.physics.purdue.edu>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:03:02AM -0500 References: <200106180644.f5I6ii172961@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010618020302.F49931@bohr.physics.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:03:02AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 11:44:44PM -0700, David W. Chapman Jr. (dwcjr@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > Log: > > Remove pgaccess as it is already in postgresql( you can install only > > pgaccess via the postgresql port) > > You'll also want to remove it from CVSROOT/modules. Actually I told him to leave it in CVSROOT/modules for now and put it on his list to remove later. Sometimes people get upset when the module goes away while there are still supported releases are out there that could potentially use it. Personally I'm indifferent to whether it should stay or go except for the fact that some people seem to have great heartburn over it when it suddenly goes away. I think this is more pertinent to src because the Ports Collection only has one branch but it seems that oftentimes when the entry is removed from CVSROOT/modules too quickly that someone jumps up and down screaming about how it is a bad idea. -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010618021104.P94855>