Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:51:58 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>, Gianmarco Giovanelli <gmarco@giovanelli.it> Subject: Re: Bcc: Re: Lucent win modems and others, why not commit ? Message-ID: <20010628115158.E97456@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010628092950A.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@osd.bsdi.com on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:29:50AM -0700 References: <20010628092950A.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:29:50AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard (jkh@osd.bsdi.com) wrote: > I think a port is going to be the most viable solution for now - this thing > requires a linux .o file as part of the module, and unless we uuencode the > thing and write some Makefile glue for installing it (which is icky), it's > not going to be a good candidate for contrib. Perhaps one of the ports > crew would be so kind as to read the instructions in: > http://www.geocities.com/wtnbkysh/INSTALL-rough-translation-en.TXT > and use their advanced Makefile-fu to automate the process? Lucent > "lose modem" support is overdue enough as it is. Sounds good to me. But I hate ports that require kernel source trees; makes it difficult to make such things on bento... -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010628115158.E97456>