Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:31:33 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: analog to COM? Message-ID: <20010710183133.A54494@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20010710190744.E65998@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>; from alex@big.endian.de on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:07:44PM %2B0200 References: <20010710180245.A54339@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010710190744.E65998@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:07:44PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: | Thus spake j mckitrick (jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org): | | > Does BSD (or Unix in general) have anything comparable to COM, with | > components, immutable interfaces, and the like? | | www.corba.org, maybe? Hmm. Isn't corba slow? I thought maybe there was a vtable oriented dynamic linking method for components. | It existed long before Microsoft had to cook their own soup[1] again. | | Alex | | [1] I first accidentally wrote "soap". I think that would have | described it even more accurately :-) So are they eating their own dogfood, cooking their own soup, or making their own soap? ;-) Jonathon -- Microsoft complaining about the source license used by Linux is like the event horizon calling the kettle black. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010710183133.A54494>