Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:04:13 +0300 (EEST) From: Alexander <amour@blade.elitsat.net> To: Joe Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: route question Message-ID: <20010712190201.N10107-100000@blade.elitsat.net> In-Reply-To: <20010712115026.L22271-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I fixed that problem :) It was pretty easy :) 1.2.3.224/28 is on ed2 1.2.3.225 and 233 are on ed1 so i simply check for their MAC adresses do route add -host 1.2.3.225 -iface ed1 arp -s 1.2.3.225 0:00:00:00:00:00 (this represents his mac) and the same thing for 1.2.3.233 next I bring down the bridge and everything works perfectly :) On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Joe Clarke wrote: > The problem is, it's not a routing issue. The kernel isn't going that > far. It will ARP for those addresses. I can't think of how to make this > work without bridging. Sorry. > > Joe Clarke > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Alexander wrote: > > > Can u tell me how can I make such a configuration. > > The IP addresses must be the same, they can't be changed. > > Isn't there a way to add the routings statically or to use ipfw's > > forwarding ? > > Any solution will be good. > > > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Joe Clarke wrote: > > > > > The W flag is the cloned flag. I don't think you can create this > > > manually. The reason your static route isn't working is that the kernel > > > is ARP'ing for the hosts, and not looking at the routing table. I'm > > > really suprised Linux let you get away with this configuration. > > > > > > Joe Clarke > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Alexander wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This routing was working before for linux server. > > > > After updating it to freebsd this problem came up. > > > > I know that this isn't a valid routing setup. > > > > > > > > 1.2.3.226 is in the network for ed2 (1.2.3.224/28) > > > > and I can't subnet it. > > > > If add the hosts manually the same thing happens > > > > flags UHLS and I can't ping the host and a big output of messages is > > > > comming. > > > > I'm just asking how to bring the "W" flag up ? (manually) > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Joe Clarke wrote: > > > > > > > > > This isn't a valid routing setup. The subnets overlap. Why not further > > > > > subnet the ed1 network so that it doesn't conflict with the /28 on ed2? > > > > > > > > > > Joe Clarke > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Alexander wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Simple question > > > > > > I have a routing: > > > > > > 1.2.3.226 52:54:0:e4:38:d9 UHLW 0 1297 ed1 957 > > > > > > This route is added by the kernel (or something like that, I haven't added it) > > > > > > and I want to add a route that has the flag "W". > > > > > > > > > > > > This is because of my problem. > > > > > > I have network 1.2.3.0/24 on ed1 > > > > > > and I have network 1.2.3.224/28 on ed2 > > > > > > but 1.2.3.226 is on ed1 > > > > > > and if I manually add it to ed1 > > > > > > e.g. > > > > > > route add -host 1.2.3.226 -iface ed1 > > > > > > it sets flags "UHLS" and no "W" and the route actually is not working, I > > > > > > can't ping the host or connect to it. > > > > > > > > > > > > If u know a solution for this problem please write me back fastly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.S. network bridge is working but it is not a solution for me. I need to > > > > > > set these flags > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010712190201.N10107-100000>