Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 18:03:49 -0700 From: "Derek C." <coffee@blarg.net> To: Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au>, Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org> Cc: "A. L. Meyers" <a.l.meyers@consult-meyers.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is "stable" "stable"? Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010722180312.03b06d30@mail.blarg.net> In-Reply-To: <200107230055.KAA05691@lightning.itga.com.au> References: <Your message of Sat, 21 Jul 2001 11:27:01 -0700.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Fortunately, the latter will usually cause you to get either compiler or linker errors, but not always. Derek At 05:55 PM 7/22/2001, Gregory Bond wrote: > > you should expect to > > occasionally see problems. People will break the build. People will have > > insufficiently tested their code and subsystems will break. > >And CVS itself is not atomic, so there is always the possibility of you >grabbing a version half-way through a series of related and interdependent >commits. There is no obvious way of fixing this that will still scale to the >sort of load that the FreeBSD CVS system has to support. > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20010722180312.03b06d30>