Date: 23 Jul 2001 14:18:39 +0200 From: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.org> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil ecalloc.c emalloc.3 emalloc.c erealloc.c estrdup.c Makefile libutil.h Message-ID: <5lae1vx2hs.fsf@assaris.sics.se> In-Reply-To: Dima Dorfman's message of "Sun, 22 Jul 2001 23:35:01 -0700" References: <20010723063501.D2E223E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> writes: > In other words, a library with these kinds of functions would be > useful as a port for consumption by people writing scratch programs > which will never see the light of day. They certainly shouldn't be > used in any production-quality programs, such as those found in our > source tree. Pray tell me what is the difference of having the same code in one of our production programs and having the same production program calling a library function? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5lae1vx2hs.fsf>