Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:50:40 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe <pir@pir.net> To: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ancontrol/ifconfig and WEP index mixup ? Message-ID: <20010725165039.C1738@pir.net> In-Reply-To: <20010725133347.A28360@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>; from brooks@one-eyed-alien.net on Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:33:47PM -0700 References: <20010725002334.A9937@pir.net> <20010724230332.C29046@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20010725143903.A1738@pir.net> <20010725120512.A14936@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20010725153337.B1738@pir.net> <20010725133347.A28360@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> probably said: > So, your saying the everything works correctly with ifconfig? You only > need to set key 1, etc? I was thinking there were problems regardless. > If I was mistaken, great. I set it up with ifconfig the output appears correctly in ifconfig and it functions correctly, yes. The only issue is the behaviour of ancontrol. > True, I may actually add support for that one, even if other MACs don't > support setting transmit power. There will always be some features one card has that nothing else has - the Cisco cards have lots of weird options I have had no reason to touch, like the antenna diversity, and some I may need at some point, like preferred access points. Where the line is on which are worthwhile bringing into ifconfig is debatable and if you are working on the support presumably up to you ;) > Please submit this as a PR. Since the connection works, fixing it isn't > too high a priority since I'm hoping to remove duplicate functionality, > at least for 5.0. Sure. Thanks, P. -- pir pir@pir.net pir@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010725165039.C1738>