Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 05:19:33 -0600 From: Duke Normandin <01031149@3web.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Freebsd Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ? Message-ID: <20010826051932.A156587@mandy.rockingd.calgary.ab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20010825174435.A86283@xor.obsecurity.org>; from "Kris Kennaway" on Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 05:44:36PM References: <20010825232029.5416537B406@hub.freebsd.org> <20010825174435.A86283@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 05:44:36PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 07:18:30PM -0400, Doug Reynolds wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 14:36:32 -0600, Duke Normandin wrote: > > > > >On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 06:11:34PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > >> > > >> Well, RELENG_4 is still technically - or might be considered ;) - > > >> 4.x-STABLE, although 4.4-RC is a better description. > > >> So yes, I guess you're right - the 4.4-RC1 snapshot of the 4.4-RC > > >> period of the RELENG_4 branch (whee..) is a better choice than > > >> any snapshot of the 4.3-STABLE period of the RELENG_4 branch.. > > >> Okay, I'll shut up now :) > > >Not yet! ;^) > > > > >RELEASE; STABLE; CURRENT are intuitive and easily understood. > > > > >What do RELENG and RC means? Roman Catholic version? RELease ENGlish > > >version? I find it difficult to draw a parallel between these last > > >two and the other three above, as I suspect a lot of others do. L8r.. > > > > RC means Release Canidate. RELENG i am not sure of.. i could only > > guess senseless names > > It refers to tags/branches created by the RELease ENGineer. > > Kris duh... why couldn't / didn't *I* think of that one? ;^) Thanks.... -- -duke Calgary, Alberta, Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010826051932.A156587>