Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 22:10:37 -0400 From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Hroi Sigurdsson <hroi@asdf.dk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Message-ID: <20010831221037.A19331@ussenterprise.ufp.org> In-Reply-To: <200109010134.f811Ytc02837@intruder.bmah.org>; from bmah@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 06:34:55PM -0700 References: <56710000.999257324@lobster.originative.co.uk> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10108310943310.81728-100000@mail.matriplex.com> <20010831154300.B27173@dragon.nuxi.com> <3B902B68.E15DFA3E@asdf.dk> <200109010134.f811Ytc02837@intruder.bmah.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 06:34:55PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> People are proposing to do various hacks to existing utilities and
> applications without having any real idea of the impact of their ideas,
> or even in some cases what semantic sense these hacks have.
For what it's worth, my original thought was that {ping,traceroute}
utilitites would simply take the "host part" of an URL and do their
normal activities.
Since that post I've gotten at least 5 other ideas of what might be
possible.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org
Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010831221037.A19331>