Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 08:53:39 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, ache@nagual.pp.ru, ru@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib strtol.c strtoll.c strtoq.c strtoul.c strtoull.c strtouq.c Message-ID: <20010905085339.C95963@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200109051135.f85BZKo61773@aldan.algebra.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:35:17AM -0400 References: <20010904165218.A59467@xor.obsecurity.org> <200109051135.f85BZKo61773@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:35:17AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > Vulnerabilities in ports are indexed by the port version: when we fix > > a vulnerability, the version gets bumped, and it's trivial to check > > whether the installed port is vulnerable. > > I realized, that I just recently saw such lines in some of ports' patch > files. They annoyed me -- at the source level, and I wonder if they > should be removed, because they never make it to the binary anyway... NO! They should not be removed. If port maintainer feels they help him and want them in the patches, leave them alone. Peroid. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010905085339.C95963>