Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, current@freeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/msdosfs denode.h msdosfs_denode.c msdosfs_lookup.c msdosfs_vfsops.c msdosfs_vnops.c 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109131417290.64766-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <200109132029.f8DKT9t13894@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Warner Losh wrote:

> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109131252080.64766-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> Julian Elischer writes:
> : Why are you doing this?
> : having pointers to threads that are calle proc is going to be REALLY 
> : confusing!
> 
> I did the opposite to make my stuff more portable to -stable.  Eg, I
> was able to get away with '#define thread proc' given my use of the
> struct thread/proc.
> 
> I find changes of this nature to be espeically bad for people that
> have to live in multiple versions of the OS.
changes of which nature (It's not sure if you are FOR
#define proc thread
or against it..

(It wouldn't be so bad if it were
#define task thread
on one OS and 
#define task proc 
on another..

> 
> Warner
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0109131417290.64766-100000>