Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, current@freeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/msdosfs denode.h msdosfs_denode.c msdosfs_lookup.c msdosfs_vfsops.c msdosfs_vnops.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109131417290.64766-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200109132029.f8DKT9t13894@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109131252080.64766-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> Julian Elischer writes: > : Why are you doing this? > : having pointers to threads that are calle proc is going to be REALLY > : confusing! > > I did the opposite to make my stuff more portable to -stable. Eg, I > was able to get away with '#define thread proc' given my use of the > struct thread/proc. > > I find changes of this nature to be espeically bad for people that > have to live in multiple versions of the OS. changes of which nature (It's not sure if you are FOR #define proc thread or against it.. (It wouldn't be so bad if it were #define task thread on one OS and #define task proc on another.. > > Warner > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0109131417290.64766-100000>