Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 21:26:01 +0900 From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@FreeBSD.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/cvs/src checkout.c cvs.h entries.c update.c update.h Message-ID: <868zfgbpye.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: <20010915131844.B79801@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> References: <200109150557.f8F5vrY99643@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010915131844.B79801@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sat, 15 Sep 2001 13:18:44 +0200,
Alex wrote:
> Thus spake Matt Dillon (dillon@FreeBSD.org):
>
> > 1.2 +659 -374 src/contrib/cvs/src/checkout.c
> > 1.2 +782 -70 src/contrib/cvs/src/entries.c
> > 1.2 +7 -5 src/contrib/cvs/src/update.h
>
> I think they should have been submitted to the CVS guys
> and vendor-imported.
Are the guys keen enough to maintain CVS? I feel depressed when I see
they don't even merge the readonly access (cvs -R) extension which
FreeBSD and OpenBSD have, and the vendor-specific tag support which
FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD have in different ways. The PAM support
is almost a must for Windows networks, but the patch hasn't been
merged either.
More than anything, it is sad that those CVS extensions aren't even
shared among *BSD.
--
/
/__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
/ ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp
"Freeze this moment a little bit longer, make each impression
a little bit stronger.. Experience slips away -- Time stand still"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868zfgbpye.wl>