Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:04:12 -0500 (CDT) From: mark tinguely <tinguely@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> To: fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru, tinguely@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: arcnet support for FreeBSD (request for review) Message-ID: <200109271404.f8RE4Cp03337@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010927145704.B16895@iclub.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:59:01PM -0500, mark tinguely wrote: > > > There is nothing like raising a topic that was last seen several months > > ago, but ... > > > > Has there been any serious consideration to committing the arcnet code > > that mentioned on 20 Jul 2001 (http://iclub.nsu.ru/~fjoe/arcnet/)? > > yes, I am working on this I noticed that the hooks for the netgraph and BRIDGE code is missing. I guess this is why I would like to see it committed so that there is not a constant catchup of new features. I also noticed that the outputed packet get bpf_mtap in two places, once for the complete packet arc_output(), and again in the outputting of the fragments (in the device driver). I wonder if the bpf_mtap in the arc_output() should be removed. I am not able to test yet, but I am willing to help. --mark tinguely To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109271404.f8RE4Cp03337>