Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 20:18:16 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Bart Kus <bsd@shell-server.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sio modification Message-ID: <5135.1001873896@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:56:02 CDT." <200109301226.0779@EO>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200109301226.0779@EO>, Bart Kus writes: >On Sunday 30 September 2001 10:38, you wrote: >> Your machine will not work too well if it is 40kHz. >> >> The PPS-API allows you to timestamp edges on DCD, if the frequency is >> more reasonable, that would work for you. Find RFC27xx for more info >> about PPS-API. > > Oh really. I was actually reading pps.c, and it looked like it was for the >parallel port interrupt pin only. I'd rather avoid cutting up this connector >if I can. Is the DCD edge timestamp (which would be PERFECT) already >implemented, or is this a spec for me to write for when modifying sio.c? It's in sio.c already. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5135.1001873896>