Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 13:58:22 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> Cc: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AIO issues... or not? Message-ID: <20011005135822.F59854@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20011005100340.T76373@canonware.com>; from jasone@canonware.com on Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 10:03:41AM -0700 References: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0110051355580.28641-100000@www.everquick.net> <20011005100340.T76373@canonware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> [011005 11:54] wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 02:19:58PM +0000, E.B. Dreger wrote: > > > > However, there's a rather ominous and non-descriptive warning > > present: "There are numerous stability issues in the current aio > > code that make it unsuitable for inclusion on shell boxes." Can > > anyone please elaborate? Is this admonition outdated? > > > > Seen on 4.3-R. > > Alan Cox has done a lot of work to make aio stable over the past year, and > I'm guessing that it's reasonably stable as of 4.2 or 4.3. That warning > can likely be removed. Where was the warning (so it can be removed)? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011005135822.F59854>