Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:44:18 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fabrizio=20Ravazzini?= <freefabri@yahoo.it> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: natd/ipfw VS ipnat/ipf Message-ID: <20011116084418.31914.qmail@web20106.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20011115101346.11165.qmail@web20105.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,we've done a Nat/firewall between our 2 Lan and the Internet with natd & ipfw. We've read somewhere that we can do the same thing using ipnat & ipfilter (as is in openbsd), the question is, why someone did so? is ipnat/ipf faster than natd/ipfw ? or also ipf more "secure" than ipfw? We question this because our 2 Lan are composed of about 200 machines, so some extra speed would be appreciated. thanks INTERNET | | |Public Ip0 _____|_________ | Router CISCO | +------+--------+ | |PublicIP1 +---------+ | NAT | |Firewall | +---------+ | |________LAN2 192.168.1.x | LAN1 10.0.0.x ______________________________________________________________________ Abbonati a Yahoo! ADSL con Atlanet! Naviga su Internet ad alta velocitą, e senza limiti di tempo! Per saperne di pił vai alla pagina http://adsl.yahoo.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011116084418.31914.qmail>