Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 01:16:47 -0800 From: Gabriel Rocha <icognito@neutraldomain.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: setantae@submonkey.net Subject: Re: Handbook addition suggestion Message-ID: <20011204011647.B50905@neutraldomain.org> In-Reply-To: <20011204085146.GA12533@rhadamanth>; from setantae@submonkey.net on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:51:46AM %2B0000 References: <20011203131316.B4133@neutraldomain.org> <20011204085146.GA12533@rhadamanth>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 04, at 08:51AM, Ceri wrote: [please CC me as I am not subbed to -docs. thanks. --gabe] | This would have been more appropriate for -docs, I feel. I agree and apologize. I tried subbing to -doc and seem to be waiting for my subscription to be approved for some reason or another and I really wanted to get that into the archives. | I agree that the handbook is off on this point, and | docs/32381 is already open regarding this issue. Oce again, had no idea ;-p Just had a fun time searching online for the docs in question and didn't find anything that was throughly useful. The need for ld-elf.so.1 I found totally by accident. I don't know if you would need it or not in a statically compiled system, I am fairly sure not, but staticaly compiled named and named-xfer binaries are not the norm at least in -stable and ldd doesn't actually show ld-elf.so.1 anywhere. I found out by actually chrooting to the sandbox by hand and trying to run things. | Is this really necessary ? | I've been running named in a sandbox on a number of systems for a | good few years now without it. If it isn't needed, I say ditch it as less is better :) Thanks for the tip. --Gabe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011204011647.B50905>