Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 15:10:48 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Price <steve@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org>, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GNOME/KDE issue with disc1 Message-ID: <20011209151048.B92399@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20011209142050.M46667@bsd.havk.org>; from steve@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:20:50PM -0600 References: <20011207181333.A97777@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011209012306.A96687@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011209183512.1467.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> <20011209142050.M46667@bsd.havk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:20:50PM -0600, Steve Price wrote: > Before we go off willy-nilly making changes to this script we > need to take some sort of poll (like I did several releases > ago) to get a sense for what people feel *must* be on the first > disc. Maybe we need an exclude list also. I know an underlaying issue is keeping dependencies together since we don't handle dependencies across CD's. GNOME and KDE are two very popular desktops and thus their basic bits certainly need to be on disc1. But due to the dependency issue, "lesser" related ports make the disc1 cut-off -- things like the 7.2MB (*compressed*) GNOME user documentation (which can easily be found on a website). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011209151048.B92399>