Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 23:43:16 -0500 From: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sparc64/sparc64 db_disasm.c Message-ID: <20011223234316.A84343@locore.ca> In-Reply-To: <20011223180829.J11014-100000@gamplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 06:12:01PM %2B1100 References: <200112230700.fBN70Or81958@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011223180829.J11014-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Apparently, On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 06:12:01PM +1100, Bruce Evans said words to the effect of; > On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Jake Burkholder wrote: > > > jake 2001/12/22 23:00:24 PST > > > > Modified files: > > sys/sparc64/sparc64 db_disasm.c > > Log: > > Define our own version of abs now that we compile with -ffreestanding by > > default. > > The bug mostly is in the -ffreestanding commit. It is in the wrong place > (not in bsd.kern.mk, so it doesn't affect modules) and is missing > -fbuiltin. Builtin functions were intentionally used for certain > optimization, so -fbuiltin is needed until these optimizations are done > more explicitly. The optimizations should be done more explicitly. What other than memcpy benefits significantly from builtins? Jake To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011223234316.A84343>