Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:31:34 -0500 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5-beta [...] Message-ID: <200202111431.g1BEVfi88777@lists.unixathome.org> In-Reply-To: <20020211141814.GX82640@squall.waterspout.com> References: <20020211123735.GA93782@madman.nectar.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 Feb 2002 at 9:18, Will Andrews wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 06:37:36AM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > I'm sorry, but I disagree. For ports with potentially complex > > relationships with other software, a `-beta' port is just what the > > doctor ordered. > > I'm not contesting that, re-read my reply. What I think Will is saying is that you can test "a `-beta' port" without putting it into the ports tree. At least, that's that I do. I test ports all the time which depend upon other software. And said ports never appear in the ports tree, but they do use many port tree entries. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202111431.g1BEVfi88777>