Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:04:21 +0000 (GMT) From: Andrew McKay <andy@openirc.co.uk> To: doc@freebsd.org Cc: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> Subject: Re: <port> replacement Message-ID: <20020214185717.C43044-100000@fluoxetine.lan> In-Reply-To: <20020214134610.A90492@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Michael Lucas wrote: ML> We don't refer to all the ports in the docs. Heck, we don't refer to ML> most of the ports. Maybe a hundred or so entities, total. That isn't ML> bad. That's what I was thinking. I haven't read every single word of FreeBSD documentation but the number of ports referred too has never seemed very large. We can see from the patches exactly how many there are (if we care to look, that is). Adding an entity every time a new ports is created would almost be a full time job but adding one whenever the need arises to refer to a port shouldn't be too difficult. ML> <commentary type="aol>Me, too!</commentary> Agreed. The bikeshed needs built so let's build it and THEN argue about the colour ;) -- Andrew McKay <andy@openirc.co.uk> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020214185717.C43044-100000>