Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 05:24:19 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Cc: <standards@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: scanf(3) patches for review Message-ID: <20020227051758.Y45742-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200202261648.IAA20603@windsor.research.att.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Bill Fenner wrote: > >Strictly, uintmax_t is not suitable for storing pointers. > > I thought uintmax_t was the largest integer type, and uintptr_t was > an integer type large enough to store a pointer -- so > sizeof(uintmax_t) >= sizeof(uintptr_t). Strictly, uintptr_t might not exist. Of course, we are unlikely to support machines where it doesn't. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020227051758.Y45742-100000>