Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:18:27 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> Cc: gnn@neville-neil.com, rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Discussion of guidelines for additional version control mechanisms (fwd) Message-ID: <57318.1014808707@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2002 03:57:47 MST." <20020227.035747.68512344.imp@village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20020227.035747.68512344.imp@village.org>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: >In message: <200202270840.AAA1409806@meer.meer.net> > "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> writes: >: The problem here is process. The FreeBSD project now has more than >: 12 core members and more than 12 committers. With any number larger >: than 12 it is VERY HARD to reach consensus on anything. Without a >: process by which we agree to reach consensus it is impossible. > >There are only only 8 core team members, unless you mean something >different by "core" here than core@freebsd.org. > >Otherwise, I tend to agree with your basic premise that it is process >and not tools at the heart of this problem. In addition to process it might be attitude. Core@ was not elected to be ornamental. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57318.1014808707>