Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:01:23 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports List <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: alternative to AUTO*HACK Message-ID: <20020227190122.GR82673@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <20020227182928.1056.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> References: <20020227175805.GA42496@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <20020227182928.1056.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:29:06PM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
> What about whenever a ports define
>
> AUTO*_VER=someversion
>
> apropriate links are made into
>
> ${WRKDIR}/auto_hack/{share,bin}
>
> and {CONFIGURE,MAKE}_ENV+=PATH=${WRKDIR}/auto_hack/{share,bin}:${PATH}
This is what my 4-exp patch already implements. I think I like
Alan's suggestion better, since it means there's less to do when
you build a port.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020227190122.GR82673>