Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:29:19 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, BOUWSMA Beery <freebsd-user@dcf77-zeit.netscum.dyndns.dk>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Performance of FreeBSD vs NetBSD (was: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203111228460.64479-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020311104543.26176.qmail@web21110.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:

> --- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
> > As you are no doubt aware there are significant infrastructural
> > changes in -current relating to SMP scalability.  It's in a very
> > interim state at the moment, and one of the downsides is increased
> > interrupt latency and lock contention for certain operations (yes,
> > audio playback is one of them).
> > 
> > Basically, it's a known issue.

He also compared stable which also was much worse.....

> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0203111228460.64479-100000>