Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:13:37 +0100 From: Ernst de Haan <ernsth@nl.euro.net> To: Herve Quiroz <hquiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr> Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Location of javadoc Message-ID: <200203151313.g2FDDbo44565@zaphod.euronet.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020315134621.I48668-100000@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <20020315134621.I48668-100000@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hey Herve,
> This could be the way to have all java relatad ports unified in the way
> they are installing data, docs, apidocs and classes. Indeed, people are
> more likely to use defined variables if they exist when otherwise they
> would do as they intend to, which may possibly not match the discussed
> "unified" way.
Yeah, you're probably right.
> PS: BTW, don't you think PORTAPIDOCS is more significant than APIDOCS_JAVA
> (which sounds more like a "global" variable and not an installing port
> related one) ? -I'm just splitting hairs here ;)
Actually I love hair-splitting! :) I'm a perfectionist, and I think you're
right. PORTAPIDOCS sounds better, although I'm missing 'JAVA' in there now.
Perhaps PORTJAVADOCS or PORTAPIDOCS_JAVA or so...
Ernst
--
Ernst de Haan
EuroNet Internet B.V.
"Come to me all who are weary and burdened
and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203151313.g2FDDbo44565>