Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 01:43:26 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Cc: freeBSD@soulfound.com, Josef Karthauser <joe@freebsd.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ls -la vs. ls -lah Message-ID: <20020328014326.GA81335@genius.tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20020318222707.GB40336@hades.hell.gr> References: <OFEILIIIFLHJBFKANOHCOEHBCAAA.freeBSD@soulfound.com> <20020318222707.GB40336@hades.hell.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 12:27:08AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > It appears that there already is a -h flag in -CURRENT, but has not been > merged to -STABLE yet. I've Cc:'ed Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org> in > this message, who made the original change to -CURRENT. > > date: 2001/12/28 20:50:12; author: joe; state: Exp; lines: +5 -1 > Add a new flag, -h which when combined with the -l option causes > file sizes to be displayed with unit suffixes; Byte, Kilobyte, > Megabyte, Gigabyte, Terabyte and Petabyte in order to reduce the > number of digits to three or less. > > Submitted by: nik > ---------------------------- > > Josef, is there any case this change is MFC'ed? > Can we help in any way? Done. Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020328014326.GA81335>