Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 21:57:12 +0300 (MSK) From: "."@babolo.ru To: will@csociety.org (Will Andrews) Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, alane@geeksrus.net, cjc@FreeBSD.ORG, will@csociety.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-xfree86@lists.csociety.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-XFree86] Re: FW: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4 Makefile Makefile.man pkg-plist pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.pc98 por Message-ID: <200203191857.VAA23844@aaz.links.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020319151403.GH22998@squall.waterspout.com> from "Will Andrews" at "Mar 19, 2 10:14:03 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will Andrews writes: > I agree that most people would usually just install all of > XFree86, so perhaps your approach doesn't suck that much. > > However, it does have the disadvantage that it will hurt bento. > One of the optimizations of this was that you didn't have to > build everything in XFree86 to get what most ports needed: libs. > Hmm, I guess the -libraries package wouldn't change so untarring > it will be the same, but it does add a little time if every > XFree86-4-* package has to build the entire thing. > > I think it's better if they just share a WRKDIR and do a 'clean' And how can I have all XFree86-4-* ports built in one system in one time for reinstall? > then build their part of XFree86. I'm still waiting for a patch. > But I'm willing to listen to other ideas/suggestions. > > Regards, > -- > wca -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203191857.VAA23844>