Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:20:12 -0800
From:      "Jesse Geddis" <sgeine@yahoo.com>
To:        "mikea" <mikea@mikea.ath.cx>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: top wrong again?
Message-ID:  <NGBBKILMGLGEDIHMGJANGEKBCBAA.sgeine@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020324171710.B1249@mikea.ath.cx>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
old emails from earlier this month. the result of this thread was the
processes aren't living long enough to show up accurately in top which
is probably likely.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
[mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of mikea
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 3:17 PM
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: top wrong again?


On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 03:10:30PM -0800, Jesse Geddis wrote:
> holy spam batman! it looks like majordomo is resending old messages.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Dave Uhring
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:56 PM
> To: sgeine@yahoo.com; Jonathan Chen
> Cc: Kris Kennaway; stable@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: top wrong again?
>
>
> On Thursday 14 March 2002 23:38, Jesse Geddis wrote:
> > here, different machine while compiling the kernel. maybe this is
> > more along the lines of the original email:
>
> > With 90% idle, I'd expect to see most of your process running 0%;
so
> > there doesn't appear to be anything wrong with your top output.
>
> OK, then try this one.  I'm running make buildworld on a 4.5-RELEASE
> system with sources CVSup'd about 1/2 hour ago.
>
> last pid: 20654;  load averages:  1.32,  1.25,  0.99
>                                 up 0+00:31:20  23:50:29
> 61 processes:  4 running, 57 sleeping
> CPU states: 89.1% user,  0.0% nice, 10.3% system,  0.6% interrupt,
> 0.0% idle
> Mem: 50M Active, 304M Inact, 74M Wired, 360K Cache, 61M Buf, 73M
Free
> Swap: 384M Total, 384M Free
>
>   PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE    RES STATE    TIME   WCPU    CPU
> COMMAND
>   157 duhring   28   0 18088K 16988K RUN      1:10  3.37%  3.37%
> XF86_Mach64
> 20653 root      56   0  3848K  3752K RUN      0:00 32.00%  1.56% cc1
>   169 duhring    2   0  7760K  5572K poll     0:22  1.07%  1.07%
> gkrellm
>   202 duhring    2   0 21324K 17212K select   0:05  0.59%  0.59%
kmail
> 20652 root      -6   0  1600K  1432K pipdwt   0:00  5.00%  0.24%
cpp0
>   197 duhring    2   0 14736K  9776K select   0:03  0.05%  0.05%
> kdeinit
>   205 duhring    2   0 20552K 16988K poll     0:19  0.00%  0.00%
knode
>   164 duhring    2   0  3124K  2848K select   0:09  0.00%  0.00%
rxvt
>  2171 duhring   28   0  2008K  1732K RUN      0:03  0.00%  0.00%
rxvt
>   101 root       2   0   912K   520K select   0:02  0.00%  0.00%
> moused

Looks much like what I saw during a make buildworld last Wed.,
except that I run setiathome as a soaker, so it'd be up at the
top.

I don't see anything wrong.

How about telling us what you think is wrong with the output?

--
Mike Andrews
mikea@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin since 1964

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NGBBKILMGLGEDIHMGJANGEKBCBAA.sgeine>