Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 04:48:32 -0500 From: Stuart Krivis <ipswitch@apk.net> To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: qmail (Was: Maintaining Access Control Lists ) Message-ID: <adp5au05ukn66lmf2mpopdhqvg0vuhs50c@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <20020325115207.GA22032@sleepy.wojomedia.com> References: <p05101505b8c430e28572@[10.0.1.9]> <000c01c1d3ab$6d2c6960$6600a8c0@penguin> <p05101509b8c47b17d088@[10.0.1.8]> <20020325015236.A97552@futuresouth.com> <p0510150eb8c48ba6b1f4@[10.0.1.8]> <3C9EFED0.DB176CB8@mindspring.com> <20020325115207.GA22032@sleepy.wojomedia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 05:52:07 -0600, Tim <tim@sleepy.wojomedia.com> wrote: > >Brad could very much be right in the end. He just couldn't get >past his DJB hatre to provide any real merits in his argument (like >judging software base on ease of configuration and the size of the >configuration file - what was that all about?). I am not surprised, It sounded valid to me. I actually prefer software that is easy to configure and doesn't need 30 million statements in 19 different config files scattered all over. (And I'm not inferring that qmail is hard to configure or that it needs wildly complex config files.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?adp5au05ukn66lmf2mpopdhqvg0vuhs50c>