Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:27:49 -0500 From: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vnode::v_op bugfix / PERFORCE change 8574 for review (fwd) Message-ID: <200203282327.g2SNRog05733@green.bikeshed.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:37:21 PST." <200203282237.g2SMbLD99685@beastie.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> wrote: > I concur with your suggestion below that the new patch is a better > approach. Your ideal solution below sounds reasonable though I have > not thought it through completely. I really, really hate the idea that the machine will panic without warning if the number of vnode ops to be used becomes greather than the statically-defined limit. Isn't there some truly generic solution? -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org <> bfeldman@tislabs.com \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203282327.g2SNRog05733>